Examining the inherent jurisdiction of the prosecutor's office and military courts in the new Code of Criminal Procedure

The Law on Criminal Procedure of the Armed Forces was adopted in 2014 and was implemented in the year. The need to change the nature of inherent jurisdiction in the new Law on Criminal Procedure of the Armed Forces as well as the confusion of judicial authorities for accurate legislative behavior under the new law Until this research is written with the aim of examining the status of inherent jurisdiction in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Armed Forces and with a descriptive-analytical method.

This research is a descriptive-analytical type and the method of collecting information was through taking notes, and collecting information from existing books, treatises and researches.

As a result of this realization, the structure and jurisdiction of military courts as a special authority for the investigation of military crimes is not specified in the new Code of Criminal Procedure, but in a plan called "Criminal Procedure Code of the Armed Forces and Electronic Procedure". And the jurisdiction of these courts has been determined. The main criterion in general should be said that the legislative approach in the adoption of the Law on Criminal Procedure of the Armed Forces and Electronic Trial has been on the integration of military judicial authorities. The establishment of one and two military courts, prosecutors' offices and wartime appeals courts are among the achievements of the new structure of the armed forces courts.