Belonging the terminating right for the contract or the same thing

Belonging the terminating right for the contract or to the object is one of the basic principles for analyzing issues such as the fall or non-fall of the terminating right for the contract with the loss of the object, the acquisition of the object and its transfer to others. Despite the importance of this problem in drafting legal concepts, its arguments have not been considered by lawyers in details. The fundamental question is that is it the fact that terminating right for the contract disappears with the loss of the object, or contract is the main subject which by losing the object, terminating right for the contract remains and the payment of the object is imposed? This research illustrates that the basic practical principle is that terminating right for the contract related to the object, but the existing jurisprudential rules and the IJTIHAD reasons of the wise approach, indicate that belonging the terminating right for the contract is such that by object losing, the wise still consider the object tax as their own self. On the other hand, the reasons which proving the terminating right for the contract are divided into two categories: arguments without any term and arguments with certain term. Also, the arguments with certain term is divided into two categories, including the arguments contain the terminating right for the contract as a certain term and the arguments contain the main object rejection as the main term. Awareness of the arguments without any term and arguments with certain term related to the terminating right for the contract confirms the belonging the terminating right for the contract. Only in the terminating right for the contract, due to the existence of consensus, existence of the object is introduced as an important subject and terminating right for the contract is belonging to the object.