Challenges of Imprisonment Implementation in the Light of International Cooperation Agreements

International treaties for the transfer of convicts to imprisonment, as evidence of the enforcement of a judicial decision of a country in another country, appear to be contrary to the aims of punishment and the territoriality of the enforcement of a criminal sentence. In these agreements, powers such as conversion and reversal of the sentence for the executing country are considered, which is in contradiction with the principle of sovereignty and judicial independence. Given these ambiguities and challenges, the scope of these extensive agreements is increasing day by day, requiring a rational justification. The globalization of criminal law, although it can be a good basis for these agreements and covering the territoriality of criminal laws and penalties, can not justify a logical change in the verdict of a judge other than the issuing authority. The assignment of rules and limitation of legal principles through these agreements and the judiciary by the issuing authority of the verdict as the philosophy of the existence of these acts is appropriate, but at the same time exceptional, but has deficiencies that require more examination. In this paper, while reviewing these agreements and the implementation challenges posed to it, it will try to provide reasonable justification for this procedure by assessing the basis for accepting agreements as a contract or an extension.