A comparative study of argumentative parts from the perspective of Farahi and Bent al-Shati

Discussion of argumentative parts is a new view that some experts have stated that the need for explanation and correct image requires contemplation of views and comparative study of the opinions of thinkers. A library based on the views of two Quranic thinkers; Professor Abdolhamid Farahi and Professor Ayesha Binta al-Shati have compared it and after a brief review of the theoretical foundations of these two experts, have compared it. Their common denominator is in opposition to the popular view in the wisdom of oaths and objections to the aspect of bowing and emphasizing the divine oaths, as well as insisting on the connection of these oaths in order to reason and make the content of the oath answer believable. In this process, the answer to the oath is considered as the main axis of the surah that the rest of the verses of the surah are in line with the proof of this main axis. To understand the content coherence of Surah Qasm, it is necessary to consider influential factors such as descriptive adverbs divided into, metaphorical and allegorical meanings of the words of Qasm and the rules of Arabic literature