The effect of the element of urgency on the system of economic contracts based on jurisprudential arguments and its theoretical foundations

Facing emergencies and, consequently, non-fulfillment of obligations contained in contracts, is one of the important issues in the new era. Considering the close relationship between the Iranian legal system and the rules and rules of jurisprudence and considering the theoretical foundations of urgency, the effect of this element on the system of economic contracts based on the said components, the purpose of this study.

The type of research is descriptive and the method used is descriptive-analytical.

The findings of the study indicate the effect of the element of urgency on the system of economic contracts at both levels of the terms and conditions of the economic contract as well as its survival or dissolution.Ethical Considerations: In this research, preserving the originality of texts and fidelity in quoting speech, as a moral imperative, has been considered by the authors.

The study of the effect of urgency on the system of economic contracts with regard to jurisprudential arguments and its theoretical foundations, shows that if the necessary legal mechanisms to control the scope of these effects are not foreseen, their obvious conflict with jurisprudential arguments will be ineffective. Theoretical foundations and moving away from the main philosophy of the state of emergency will not be far from the mind.