The position of middle circles in organizational governance and its role in civilization by looking at the category of partisanship

In a political system based on Velayat-e-faghih, as the flag bearer of the discourse of religious democracy, people are both the irst and existential cause of the revolution and the accompanying system emanated from it, and at the same time the remaining cause of the two. In fact, sovereignty will have no meaning without people , because people, as the blessings of God, cannot be said to have no relationship with various ruling, managerial and social aspects of sovereignty and its great consequential aspirations which is creation of modern Islamic civilization.This article prepared with a qualitative method along with descriptive, analytical approach seeks to find an answer to the question that what mechanism and pattern should be sought in order to be able to bridge  the gaps between people and the government and to interconnect the chain of government and people at all levels, including the mass and elite, in such a way that social cohesion and public movement – which are the core basis for creation of civilization - are best achieved.This model, which is interpreted as the flow of middle circles, can be used in a specialized process, ranging from infrastructural preparation to training and staffing at the micro, medium and macro levels to employ people's capacities, especially the young generation, and to serve as linkage between the people and the government. The concept of middle rings is located in a conceptual system. Therefore, its conceptual network must be discovered and formulated. In this context, with a pathological approach, the issue of partisanship and its capacities has been raised as one of the examples of middle circles.