the role of language studies in dynamic interpretation of international law texts (with a special focus on the term TASK FORCE)

To understand and analyze International Law Language (ILL)[1] , one should consider many cognitive- linguistic factors which have to be determined in its own place. The common languages of IL include two official languages of International Court of Justice (ICJ), English and French, and the UN ones, Arabic, Spanish, English, Chinese, Russian and French, in which texts and instruments and made and concluded. According to the evidences, it is considered that IL lawyers and researchers of our country, like some rare cases, should be familiarized with “cognitive- linguistic” components to perceive “semantic- pragmatic” phases of IL languages specially English and French in the best way. In this paper, therefore, we are to analyze in detail some linguistic aspects of IL languages in a comparative method. Which is going to be important in this article is that all of the conclusions are mad by comparative model of analysis between most useful languages of International Law. [1]. According to our studies, this is the first time that this acronym is used and it is because of new model of comparative studies between linguistics and language of international law which is the first time that is done in this paper.