Validation of Will in Realization of Signification Based on Approach ofImam Khomeini to the Nature of Signification

The study of the relationship between speech and meaning has a serious impacton the finding of the manifestation and analysis of the coining of the word. One ofthe controversial issues in this regard is that verbal signification is a factor of thespeaker’s will. For instance, if the speakers utters a word in sleep, does it connoteto its meaning, or, just by hearing a word, although there is no will to make thelistener understand its meaning, signification is formed? Avicenna (Abu Ali Sina)argues that signification is a factor of the will that has been criticized by scholars.There are two claims to prove his argument. First, coining for a speech that isnot meant by the speaker is invalid. Hence the coiner has coined the word onlyfor the meaning of what he intends. Second, will is effective in the significationof the truth. Hence, without will, signification does not hold true. However, boththe arguments have been questioned by some scholars. The present study is anattempt to explain and critically study the main controversy with emphasis onthe nature of signification and its commitment to knowledge based on ImamKhomeini’s viewpoint about signification. The findings of the study show thatAvicenna’s argument is valid.