Prevention of unusual judicial decision and violation of the rights of individuals in the extraordinary stage of proceedings

At the stage of extraordinary ways of complaining about votes, there are challenges and fundamental inadequacies that provide the basis for making unconventional decisions in rejecting or confirming the verdict and violating the rights of citizens. Unconventional judicial rulings in the extraordinary stage of proceedings can be created due to the presence of several factors such as defects in laws, limitations of judges in interpreting laws, the occurrence of mistakes, the fault and intentionality of judges, which have harmful effects and consequences in the inefficiency of the judicial system and the violation of the rights of individuals. becomes Therefore, the following article tries to explain and analyze the strategies and preventive policies from the issuing of unconventional verdicts by judges and the unjust conviction of people against fairness and judicial justice in the stage of extraordinary methods of protesting votes.

The present article has been carried out using a descriptive-analytical method based on authentic documentary and library sources.

It is necessary to foresee the warning of the representative of the prosecutor to the auditor in the report of violations and crimes of each of the judges involved in the case, to remove the existing limitation of issues that can be appealed from final decisions, to remove the resumption of special proceedings at the discretion of the judiciary, to restore the supreme supervision. In the Court, adopting the basis of judge's interpretation instead of binding judges to the text of the law,