Online boycott: criminal action or reaction at the level of international law

In today's age, the Internet as a wide and important communication tool can be sanctioned based on Article 41 of the United Nations Charter and international laws under the guaranty of implementation. Despite this prediction, no clear action has been reported by the Security Council in this regard. Although in practice, these are the governments that apply this restriction against each other without any permission and legal order and accept such restrictions within the limits of their international treaties and legal principles, but this is only as long as the countries are within the scope of power. have not taken action. In this case, instead of being a guarantee of enforcement, the internet ban becomes criminal in nature and is condemned by another enforcement guarantee. With the studies carried out in this research, in a descriptive-analytical way, the internet embargo is expressed in two distinct concepts and examples, one time as a guarantee of implementation and another time as an international crime, and finally, this is expected from the Security Council with Such behavior that violates international security and peace on a macro level, such as war and internet terrorism, and the International criminal Court should apply the necessary procedures for judicial proceedings