Investigating the relationship between the word "Tasalom" and similar concepts

Conceptology and the correct understanding of words is a scientific discussion because understanding concepts plays a major role in judging scientific evaluations. The word "Tasalom" is one of the most widely used words in contemporary jurisprudential texts that identifying its position and how to use it can play an important role in understanding jurisprudential content and valuing it. In this article, in a descriptive and analytical way, we have tried to identify this concept and examine its relationship with other similar concepts such as consensus, non-contradiction, agreement, fatwa reputation, and necessity. According to research findings," Tasalom" in terms of burden of jurisprudential concept is different from all seemingly similar words.Consensus requires the discovery of the infallible's opinion, and whether or not there is proof of the consensus is effective in its validity. Agreement and non-contradiction are either lower levels than consensus in the words of jurists, or a word synonymous with consensus that must meet the conditions of consensus. Fatwa reputation is also out of comparison with "Tasalom" due to the fact that its validity is lower than non-contradiction. The relationship between peace and jurisprudential necessity is also different, despite being more similar than others; Including in terms of comparative detail and inclusiveness in relation to all branches, the fact that the issue is certain in the eyes of the jurist who claimed "tasalom", and also its inclusiveness in relation to principle issues of principle in addition to jurisprudence. As a result, "tasalom" has no semantic affinity or synonymy with any of the mentioned concepts