Criticizing the Ontology of Neoliberal Institutionalism Theory in Transboundary Water Disputes

Conflict, an inevitable part of human interactions, is a complex, dynamic, and multidisciplinary process with interactions with a variety of social systems. The differences in theoretical frameworks and distinct understanding of human relations led to the formation of different theories to deal with the conflict. Neoliberal institutionalism is one of the novel theories in the field of political, economic, and social studies, emphasizing the importance of institutions in shaping behavior. According to this theory international institutions are effective tools for creating convergence and international cooperation. Liberal institutionalist perspectives are widely accepted and used by researchers in the fields of environment and water management. Water institutionalists believe that international water institutions can significantly reduce international water conflicts and promote water cooperation. However since water institutions have not always succeeded in that aim, serious criticisms have been made on institutionalism theory. Despite the importance of studying and analyzing the theoretical background of the neoliberal institutionalism and transboundary water conflicts, no specific scientific research has been conducted in this regard.  This study critically examines the capacity of neoliberal institutionalism to deal with water conflicts and to facilitate effective cooperation in transboundary river basins.