Diagnosis of Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Review

Message:
Article Type:
Research/Original Article (دارای رتبه معتبر)
Abstract:
Background and Aim

Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) accounts for 1% to 4% of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) cases and can be associated with complications and mortality. This study aims to review the upper extremity DVT diagnosis methods and evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of commonly available diagnostic tests for upper extremity DVT that can be used to provide a combined diagnosis strategy.

Materials and Methods

Articles in this study, national databases, including Magiran, SID, and IranMedex, as well as international databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ISI databases, were searched for related books and articles. Keywords, including upper extremity deep vein thrombosis, thrombolysis, diagnosis, upper extremity deep vein thrombosis, thrombolysis, and diagnosis were searched and finally, 50 articles were reviewed.

Results

The accuracy of the D-dimer test for the diagnosis of UEDVT was evaluated in two studies. The sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer with a cut-off value of 500 micrograms per liter are 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78% to 100%), 14% (95% CI, 4% to 29%), 92% (95% CI), 73% to 99%), and 60% (95% CI, 52% to 67%). Duplex ultrasound has become the first line of diagnosis. The combined sensitivity and specificity of different ultrasound methods were, respectively, 84% (95% CI, 72% to 97%) and 94% (95% CI, 86% to 100%) for non-compression doppler ultrasound, 97% (95% CI, 90 to 100%) and 96% (95% CI, 87 to 100%) for compression ultrasound, and 91% (95% CI, 85 to 97%) and 93% (95% CI, 80 to 100%) for compression doppler ultrasound.

Conclusion

UEDVT is an increasing clinical problem and requires accurate and rapid diagnosis to prevent complications. Clinical suspicion should be confirmed by diagnostic imaging methods, such as duplex ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) scan, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A diagnostic strategy based on sequential evaluation of clinical factors and D-dimer test can avoid imaging in about a quarter of patients. Ultrasound is widely used as a first-line imaging test and, if inconclusive, may be followed by a second ultrasound, CT venography, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Language:
English
Published:
Journal of Vessels and Circulation, Volume:3 Issue: 3, Summer 2022
Pages:
107 to 116
magiran.com/p2631155  
دانلود و مطالعه متن این مقاله با یکی از روشهای زیر امکان پذیر است:
اشتراک شخصی
با عضویت و پرداخت آنلاین حق اشتراک یک‌ساله به مبلغ 1,390,000ريال می‌توانید 70 عنوان مطلب دانلود کنید!
اشتراک سازمانی
به کتابخانه دانشگاه یا محل کار خود پیشنهاد کنید تا اشتراک سازمانی این پایگاه را برای دسترسی نامحدود همه کاربران به متن مطالب تهیه نمایند!
توجه!
  • حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران می‌شود.
  • پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانه‌های چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمی‌دهد.
دسترسی سراسری کاربران دانشگاه پیام نور!
اعضای هیئت علمی و دانشجویان دانشگاه پیام نور در سراسر کشور، در صورت ثبت نام با ایمیل دانشگاهی، تا پایان فروردین ماه 1403 به مقالات سایت دسترسی خواهند داشت!
In order to view content subscription is required

Personal subscription
Subscribe magiran.com for 70 € euros via PayPal and download 70 articles during a year.
Organization subscription
Please contact us to subscribe your university or library for unlimited access!