Usage of the Proofs of Forbiddingness of Squanderin the Jurisprudential Verdict of Harming the Self

One of the most important issues in the field of medical jurisprudence is the issue of harming a person to his own body, which is called self-harm. Apparently, none of the jurists have doubted the forbiddingness of harming the oneself that leads to the destruction of the self or the amputation of a body part; However, damages less than death and amputation have been disputed and most jurists have considered it impermissibility and others have considered it permissible. Those who say about forbiddingness have provided various proofs for it, but none of them cited the proofs of forbiddingness of squander and waste.
This article answers this question with descriptive analytical method and library information: Is it possible to prove the forbiddingness of self-harm to a lesser amount than suicide and organ amputation by referring to the proofs of the forbiddingness of squander and waste? That is, are the proofs that indicate the forbiddingness of squander and wastage also applicable in the issue of self-harm or not? The findings of this research show that different methods can be imagined to invoke the proofs of forbiddingness of squander and wastage, but the only correct method is to use the method of adjustment of criteria and rational priority, which can state the priority of self-preservation compared to property. Therefore, it is possible to use the proofs of forbiddingness of squander to prove the forbiddingness of self-harm.