Identifying and Criticizing the exaggerated Traditions about Imams (pbuh) in 'Ayyāshī and Qumī Interpretations

Analyzing and examining traditions is one of the requirements in the field of hadith and for defending and protecting it; This necessity is more important in interpretive traditions for some reasons, especially the hadiths that have been transmitted about the infallible Imams (pbuh); traditions which are not only to explain their position, but may be a pretext for some opponents and dissidents. The present research seeks to answer the question of whether the exaggerated traditions have been included in 'Ayyāshī and Qumī Interpretations about the Imams (pbuh)? And what are the Isnad and their content? The results indicate that some of the traditions of these two exegeses, which will be mentioned in detail in the second part of the article, were exaggerated; Including the belief in the divinity of the Imams (pbuh) and their unusual creation and some unacceptable interpretations, that of course this traditions have weak Isnad and on the other hand are incompatible with the meanings and context of the verses. The research method in this article is descriptive-analytical and comparative.