Feasibility study of the existence of contractual and contractual examples for a legal act

In order to analyze and distinguish the legal nature, jurists have divided legal events into legal actions and events. The criterion of will as the basis of exclusive division has caused any legal nature of it to be under the headings of event, contract or agreement; In the meantime, some have not considered this division as comprehensive of all natures, and have forged a third clause as a part of contract and agreement, as a purgatory between the two, and some as a third nature. The weakness of the principles and many ambiguities of this approach along with the shortcomings of the first division have caused some, regardless of the existing divisions, while commenting on a legal nature such as forgery, to express that forgery can be both a contractual and a contractual application; Without questioning whether this capability is specific to a particular legal nature or whether it is possible to extend it? Nor is it addressed how a legal act can have different contractual and contractual instances? Finally, we will be faced with an approach that recognizes the existence of a verbal commonality between different instances. In this article, what has been achieved is that for a legal action, contractual and contractual examples can be considered. Such a theory requires a correct interpretation of the legal practice in order to be able to consider it as a possibility that can contain distinct examples and can be proposed as a general theory.