The Position of Suspicion in the Area of Claim Justification in Security Sectors

Suspicion is a sort of exercising immoderation and it means one’s own mental perception of others about unpleasant things and reckoning bad ideas in heart and mind and putting these thoughts into effect in words and behaviors; suspiciousness is a bad attribute that comes about as a result of factors like faith weakness, unhealthy and unsound social and familial environment, psychological and ethical factors and cowardice and frailty. The present study tries investigating the position of suspicion in the area of proof justification in the security sectors. The researcher adopts a descriptive-analytical approach towards the study subject. Documentary method (library research) and note-taking have been the methods of choice for gathering information. The investigations indicated that due to the vastness of the religion’s realm and its not being limited to the individual and worshipping affairs and since the prevalence of suspicion causes an increase in the fear amongst the individual members of the society and prevents the social cooperation, unification and sympathy, the religion’s social function should be also taken into account. Suspicion does not exist in the form of an independent title in the laws and statutory provisions but, with a little compromise, the term “suspicion” can be considered as an intention for the perpetration of crime with the intention being interpretable according to article 122 of the penal lore. However, according to jurists, the malicious intention stipulated in article 515 of the Islamic penal code of law can be synonymously taken as suspicion. In the penal laws, some of the cases like the prohibition of slandering and aspersion, insolence, suspected murders, legitimate defense and dispersion of falsehood can be enumerated amongst the sources of suspicion.