The Impact of ‘Allāmah Ṭabāṭabā’ī's Theory of Subjective Considerations (I’tibāriyāt) on the Issue of the Unity of Desire and Will in the Science of Principles of Jurisprudence
The theory of subjective considerations (i’tibāriyāt) is an epistemological theory that has had a significant influence in various domains of knowledge. The Principles of Jurisprudence is one of the most important sciences where the theory of subjective considerations has been foundational, and ‘Allāmah Ṭabāṭabā’ī, in his book "Al-Kifāyah with annotation", has utilized this theory to explore the issues of this major science. According to him, "command and prohibition" are subjective matters, and the consequences of subjectivity is the leadership. Command is the act of associating and connecting the desire and will to another action. One of the most contemporary issues in the domain of command in the Principles of Jurisprudence is the problem of the unity of desire and will, where scholars like Ākhūnd Khurāsānī have endorsed unity of desire and will in terms of meaning, creation, and the outside. However, ‘Allāmah Ṭabāṭabā’ī has addressed this issue in the three domains: linguistic, usūlī and rational. He utilizes the implications of the theory of subjective considerations to explain and resolve it.
-
Contextualization of Quranic Teachings as a Framework for the Development of the Coherence of Social Systems
Jafar Torkzadeh *, Tooraj Derakhshanfar, Rahmatollah Marzooghi, Mohammadjavad Salmanpur, Jafar Jahani
Journal of Islam and Social Sciences, -
A Critical Review of "Non-Existence of God" on the Aristotle's Book “Nicomachean Ethics” and its Effect on Philosophical Ethics Writing among Muslims
*, Mojtaba Javidi, Alireza Farsinejad
Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Juman Sciences, -
Evaluation of the Interpreters’ Views on Attribution of Perversity to God by Iblis and its Theological Conclusions
Ali Akbar Kalantari *, Sayyid Mahdi Mostafavi, Mahdi Ahmadi,
Qur'anic Researches, -
Methodology of Imam Ali’s (AS) confrontation with Taboos A Critique of the Generality of the Rule “punishment for all forbidden acts”
Mojtaba Javidi *, Rahim Kazemi,
Pazuhesname- ye Alavi,