Examining and criticizing the views of Shia and Sunni jurists on the use of Idhtiba' and Raml (Harvaleh) in Tawaf

Among the practices of Hajj and Umrah is circumambulation around the House of God, for which rules and customs are mentioned in the Sharia. Among the customs that are disputed by Islamic jurists in this practice are the use of Idhtiba' and Raml in Tawaf. Most of the jurists of the Sunni denominations of thought have considered these two actions Mustahab based on the life of the Messenger of God, and some of them have ruled that Harvaleh is obligatory. Some of the advanced jurists of the Imamiyyah have also considered these two acts as mustahab, citing the above-mentioned reason. According to most of the Imami jurists, these two actions after the Prophet were not recommended, and on the other hand, they considered it recommended moving slowly and with moderation in Tawaf. In this research, while explaining the reason for the emergence of these two practices in Islam and proposing the views raised by the jurists of Islamic denominations, the sum of the two recent views is counted as the correct theory in this regard, and while criticizing the evidence of the first view, this view is proved with various and numerous proofs. it is arrived.