A Theoretical Explanation of the Process of Globalization and the Project of Cultural Invasion

To further remove the boundaries of time and place, establish mutual understanding and sympathy among cultures, promote convergences, expand theoretical and practical interactions of various natures, increase the compromise among and between people and societies; these are the objectives which if intended for the concept of globalization, are indicative of its natural origin in human beings and of the love and compassion of people towards each other. Globalization, in the above definition, is meant to strengthen inter-cultural relations, provide extensive security for all, encourage seeking the truth, love for knowledge, freedom and justice, and protection of human dignity.By globalization, if we intend to remove independence from autonomous political units and pave the way for Non-Western cultures and civilizations to follow the Western cultures and the American culture above all, then globalization is no more than the natural fruit of the theoretical foundations of the Western thought and the result of the economic and militarist policies. The West wishes other political units to have unprotected identity and national boundaries; thus, it seeks to wrongly present as rightful the basic theoretical foundations of the Western types of globalizations; it utilizes all methods and means of cultural NATO and soft war to practice globalization in its various types, i.e. cultural (humanism and pluralism), political (liberalism and secularism), military (militarism), scientific (scientism) and through defending unjustified pluralism. This power seeking and materialistic globalization, which is in contradiction with man’s nature, is theoretically rootless and of no identity, and cannot resist the rich and revolutionary ideology of Islam.Through the pathology of Islam, it will be revealed that the West is very deceptive in using such slogans as human rights, freedom, rationalism, liberal-democracy, etc, and that it is merely in search for further hegemony and reconsolidation of neocolonialism. This demagogy is not far reaching; it will not take long before nations oppose it by identifying its origin and the vulnerability of cultural NATO and strategies to confront the soft war of the world devouring countries. Consequently, the world arrogance will not be relieved even within their own borders. Surely, the ultimate victory belongs to the global movement of Islam and the uprising of the oppressed.