A Comparative Study on Effective Indicators of Communicational Justice in Organizations Comparison between Islamic and Western Management

The study is mainly intended to review the effective indicators of relationship between Islamic and Western management. First, the indicators of Western approach were acquired from the related sources. Then, having searched among religious texts, including verses of the holy Quran and Hadith (religious traditions), the researchers came to thirteen indicators for measuring communicational justice. After designing the questionnaires and conducting a pretest, the two groups of indicators were studied to develop a main hypothesis as well as four peripheral hypothesis. A field study,containing 210 subjects from managers and employees of an organization was conducted and the results were analyzed. The results indicated that there was a significant difference between the Islamic approach and that of the West with regard to the main hypothesis. Indicators of the Western approach were not predictive in measuring thevariables of communication justice. The results with regard to the peripheral hypotheses indicated that open communication and affirmative factors (good behavior) were effective in the realization of communication justice. On the other hand, elimination factors (misbehavior) negatively affected the variable. With regard to the second peripheral hypothesis, the Western indicators were found to have no effect on communication justice.