نشریه تحقیقات سیاسی و بین المللی
پیاپی 46 (بهار 1400)

The main issue in this regard has been Trump's policies and approaches to the fight against and control of the coronavirus on the one hand, and the support of various sections and classes of the American society, including medical, economic, and so on. An issue that did not materialize in practice and led to protests from a wide range of people, giving him a broad functional legitimacy for Trump and the neoconservative administration. In this article, the authors attempt to answer the question: what impact the Corona crisis has had on the functioning and legitimacy of the Trump administration, and what is the possible future for the US socio-political system? The authors' hypothesis in this article indicates the intensification of the Trump administration's crisis of legitimacy during the outbreak of the Coronavirus in this country, and the findings of the article show that the use of written descriptive and analytical methods, the use of written and library resources indicate the possible occurrence of three It will be a major consequence for Trump. First; Defeat in the upcoming US presidential election; Second, the deepening of bipolarity in the United States and, ultimately, the emergence of security crises in the United States

The Syrian developments after 2011 led to the adoption of conflicting positions and policies by regional and international actors in the face of the unrest in this country. Turkey in the Syrian neighborhood organized and supported the Syrian opposition, which eventually led to military intervention. Such a move would not only complicate the Syrian crisis, rather, its domestic and regional consequences led to the aggression of Turkish foreign policy.This study seeks to investigate and answer the question of what are the factors influencing the aggressiveness of Turkey's foreign policy towards Syria between 2015 and 2020? In answer to this question, several factors are raised. That Turkish policy during this period was influenced by the increase in the activity of insurgent groups and proxy wars inside Syria and at the same time the political and military movements of the Kurds in the northern regions of the country. At the same time, Ankara sought to increase regional power, a combination of which has made Turkish foreign policy more involved. The research method is analytical-explanatory which uses data collection from books and documents. John Mersheimer's theory of aggressive realism is used to explain and analyze the subject of the research.

Donald Trump is one of the political figures whose understanding of the nature of his thinking and behavior has attracted the attention of psychologists more than any previous president of the United States of America, because he shows high levels of mobility and excitement. Thus, many psychologists have attempted in their numerous articles and interviews to analyze the behavior and words of Trump based on various personality tests. This article attempts to highlight the similarities and differences in the findings of the most reliable diagnoses and study the intellectual and psychological structure of Donald Trump. The main question here is concerned with the nature of Donald Trump’s character and how his behavior can be understood, analyzed and predicted. To this end, Trump’s character has been studied through the lenses of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist, DSM-4’s Narcissistic Personality Disorder, Millon Inventory of Diagnostic Criteria, The Big Five Model, and the six-dimensional HEXACO Model. Examining and evaluating the results of various psychological tests and analyzing Trump's personality can lead to a deeper understanding of political behaviors and actions and the possibility of predicting his actions during his term in the presidential office..

In recent years, many countries in the world have a positive view of population growth, and accordingly, they have moved their policies towards incentive policies. Also, due to the decline in Iran's fertility below the replacement level in the mid-2000s, Iran's peronatalist policies resumed in 2006 after almost two decades. The purpose of this study is to review Iran's population incentive policies and compare it with other countries in the world. European countries are at the top of the list with negative population growth rates Who have tried to change the appearance of their population. Their incentive policies are mostly in the form of financial aid, education facilities, health, even in the form of vacation packages,. But in Iran, barriers to childbearing and even higher barriers to marriage have not yet been removed from young people, and incentives for marriage and childbearing have been written only on paper. Therefore, it is necessary for the authorities in the Iran to solve the necessary conditions as well as the economic problems of families as well as the problems of youth marriage, so that families can increase the generation and youth for marriage, without any economic or social problems, etc. Encourage the issue.

The presence of non-state actors, such as the European Union, in international relations, has revolutionized the nature of multilateralism. This development has led to the emergence of a new type of multilateralism called multilateralism2.0 or modern multilateralism. This concept is taken from Web 2.0 and its main features are the diversity of multilateral organizations, the growing importance of non-governmental actors such as regional organizations, multipolar order, and open system. The authors, therefore, seek to introduce the concept of multilateralism as a metaphor for understanding the role of the European Union in the evolving context of international relations. This article seeks to answer this question: how the EU has been at the forefront of this kind of multilateralism. The authors argue that entry into multilateralism2.0 requires the role of regional actors. The European Union, as a regional player with membership in the United Nations and the G8, has been able to lead the way in modern multilateralism. In fact, in order to redefine its role in the context of the international system, the European Union has sought to adapt to these developments. In this article, the authors tried to evaluate the question and hypothesis of the article in a descriptive-analytical manner.

China's expansionist policies have increased the country's need for energy resources and increased oil and gas imports from around the world, especially from the Persian Gulf. This has drawn China's attention to the two main pillars of energy supply in the Persian Gulf: Iran and Saudi Arabia. However, China-Saudi Arabia and China-Iran's energy relations have had many ups and downs and the main reason can be found in the political issues and specific issues of the region, including the special relations between this two countries with the United States. This research seeks to answer the question of how U.S. sanctions against Iran in 2009-2019 have affected China and Saudi Arabia's oil cooperation. In response to this hypothesis, an explanatory method is used to examine that U.S. sanctions against Iran, by reducing the opportunities for China-Iran's energy cooperation, have led to the expansion of China –Saudi Arabia's oil cooperation in 2009-2019. This research concludes that the U.S. sanctions system isolated the powerful Iran in the economic field and created a golden opportunity for China and Saudi Arabia to strengthen their economic relations, especially energy relations.

The question of this research is examination the most important identity ideas that effecting on formation Iran foreign policy behavior unto Kurdistan regional government. These ideas have assessment in three levels with a descriptive-analytical approach: domestic, regional and international. In domestic dimension, Iran Kurdish character (especially Sunni Kurdish) as important variable on Iran foreign policy unto KRG has analyzing on three field containing political, economical and cultural. Political ideas especially different imagination Islamic republic of Iran and some Iran opposition Kurdish groups that supported by KRG led to securitization Iran foreign policy unto KRG. In economical dimension relations between both parties developing, however stocks of Iran Kurdish regions assess few. In cultural ideas there were identity- Differentiation, that prevented bi-cultural collaboration. In regional ideas the Iran priority after 2003 was Iraq Shiite central state that always influence on Iran and KRG relations. International ideas also causes as divergent factor. Islamic republic of Iran has recognizing USA and Israel as identity-others that have trying to decreases their influence in KRG.