نشریه پژوهش های راهنماشناسی
پیاپی 3 (پاییز و زمستان 1400)

Prophets (external messengers) play a role for the flourishing of human reasons, who are considered as inner messengers; therefore, research in this matter is important. But there may be a doubt that despite the internal messengers, there is no necessity for the existence of external messengers; this can cause the Islamic community to have a religious challenge. As a result, the question arises, how can external messengers play a role in the flourishing of inner messengers? It is assumed that inner messengers alone are not enough for the guidance and happiness of people, and there is a need for prophets and messengers to remove the dust from the human reason Intellect and awaken his Fitrah. This article, relying on library sources and descriptive analytical method, deals with how prophets play a role in the flourishing of inner messengers. The findings of the research show that the flourishing of inner messengers has a process in which prophets and imams play a role and prepare the ground for the growth and flourishing of reasons and confront the obstacles to its flourishing.

Axial Guardianship has a serious role in consolidating the guardianship system, but it may be claimed by many people who in fact do not have this characteristic; Therefore, the question that can be raised is, what characteristics should the claimants of following the guardian have in order to be called as followers of the guardian? The hypothesis is that if a person has velayat-orientation in the dimensions and aspects of cognition, attitude and behavior, then he can be called follower of guardian. By describing and analyzing the verses and hadiths related to the following of guardianship, this article deals with its epistemic, tendency and behavioral aspects, And the result is that following of guardianship has cognitive dimensions, such as knowing the guardian, knowing the guardian's enemies, and tendencies, such as trusting and loving the guardian, as well as behavioral dimensions, such as defending and obeying the guardian and the like, through which we can know the true follower of guardian.

In verses 105 and 106 of Surah Nisa, the Prophet is assigned to seek forgiveness. The problem of the upcoming article is the primitive contradiction between forgiveness and Prophet's infallibility in these two verses. The efforts of Shia and Sunni commentators in solving this apparent contradiction were studied and investigated in a comparative manner from three perspectives: the cause of descent, the concept of forgiveness, and the audience. Most of the Shia commentators have explained the issue of forgiveness and its belonging with an approach taken from the traditions of Ahl al-Bayt regarding the revelation of the Qur'an, and by recognizing the principle of the Prophet's infallibility as Islam, and some of them, by providing a new meaning of the word forgiveness, have considered it a form of rosary and worship. On the other hand, Sunni commentators have expressed their opinions in two general approaches. Some have interpreted the verse without pointing out the contradiction due to the theological basis of "the permission to issue a minor sin" from the Prophet, And some others, like the Imami commentators, have taken a new approach to the meaning of asking for forgiveness in maintaining the Prophet's infallibility, or considered the verse to be addressed to the Prophet's Ummah.

Meditation is one of the methods of mastering the mind in emerging spirituality, which is used to obtain peace and happiness, and is one of the accessories of yoga. The purpose of meditation is introspection, education and control of the mind with introspective techniques to achieve deep and long happiness, awareness and peace independent of others. These techniques are introduced in the form of emerging spirituality, meditation and introspection, which are among the challenges of contemporary society. These techniques, which are devoid of spirituality, claim that their application is the only way to achieve peace. The main question of this article is what is the ruling of meditation from the perspective of Islamic teachings and what are its theological foundations? This research tries to explain meditation and its types and compare it with Islamic meditation by using the descriptive-analytical method and using library sources, and during this research, to criticize the theological foundations of meditation. The finding of the article is that meditation is a quasi-meditation based on the foundations of emerging mysticism, such as humanism, secularism, postmodernism, pluralism and nihilism, and has nothing to do with Islamic teachings; Also, from the point of view of jurisprudence, due to the inclusion of dance, music and meaningless words, it is considered a kind of abrogation and is subject to the obligation of sanctity.

One of the challenges of today's society is radical Shiism, which is emerging in the form of currents such as English Shiism. The problem is that the wrong understanding of the concept of Wilāyatand love has caused some Ahl al-Bayt lovers to ignore and indulge in their behavior and speech and perform their religious duties.In such a way that sometimes it has led to exaggeration and exaggeration and sometimes to immorality and justifying the commission of sin by thinking that the sin can be removed with the love of Ahl al-Bayt.On the other hand, the wrong view of hatred of the enemies of the Ahl al-Bayt also leads to extreme confrontations and divisive and sometimes violent behavior. In order to solve this problem, we must answer the question, who is the desired Shia of Imam Sadiq and what are his expectations from the true Shia?The life of the Prophet and the Ahl al-Bayt is based on reason and logic, observing Islamic ethics, the principle of Muslim brotherhood and unity, and avoiding excesses.Data collection in this research is library and software and the research method is descriptive and analytical; For this purpose, the behavioral indicators of extremism and examples of the traditions of the infallible imams were investigated and analyzed with the aim of explaining their true Shia, and we found that the expectations of the infallible imam from the ideal Shia are mostly based on the behavioral characteristics of the Shiites, and the salvation of man depends on faith and action. Shi'ism is all about love and kindness of the Ahl al-Bayt. Simply claiming to love God, the Prophet and the Ahl al-Bayt does not lead to salvation, nor is it a license for extremism, violence, and excommunication of the opponents and the desirable Shi'a.

The general opinion is that the realization of dignity is in the hands of divine saints, but the issue of guardianship is one of the controversial issues among Muslim thinkers. There is a difference of opinion among the scholars as to who is the real actor in the extraordinary possession and what is the extent of the possession of the imams (peace be upon them). Examining the foundations of Ibn Abi Jumhur on the issue of wilāyat is important; He is one of the first Shiite theologians who introduced the principles of Sufism into theology and explained "wilāyat" with the principles of Sufism. This research has explained the principles of Ibn Abi Jumhur in the matter of the province with a descriptive-analytical method. Among his foundations in the matter of wilāyat, we can mention the particularity unity of existence, al-wahed rule, principle of causality, and the truth of Muhammadiyah. By accepting the aforementioned principles and the full influence of Ibn Arabi's Sufism and the Illuminationist philosophy, he has put their principles in explaining the formative possession of the Prophet and Imams and has put them in front of the views of theologians.