Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
Volume:17 Issue: 1, Winter 2023

The role of dairy product consumption on oral cancer risk is not yet fully clarified. Some studies have observed an inverse association between dairy consumption and oral cancer risk. This study aimed to determine the influence of dairy product consumption (milk, cheese, yogurt, butter) on oral cancer risk.

A search for studies on dairy products and oral cancer was conducted in the following databases: PubMed (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus. The estimation of the odds ratio (OR) effect was performed with the generic inverse variance method using the logarithm of the effect with the standard error (SE) and 95% confidence intervals.

Twenty-one studies with 59271 participants (8,300 oral cancer patients and 50971 controls) were included in this meta-analysis. All dairy products significantly reduced oral cancer risk except butter (P=0.16). Milk intake reduced oral cancer risk by 27% (OR: 0.73; P<0.001); yogurt consumption by 25% (OR: 0.75; P<0.001), and cheese consumption by 21% (OR:0.79; P<0.01).

Regular consumption of dairy products reduces oral cancer risk between 21% and 27%.

The relationship of the root of the maxillary third molars and the maxillary sinus (MS) is an important predictor of the anticipated difficulty in extraction. The aim of this study was to assess the location of maxillary third molars to the inferior wall of the MS in a sample of Pakistani population evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging and to assess if age or gender has any influence on third molar to MS distance.

The CBCT scans of adult patients, carried out keeping image volume at 8 cm×8 cm, and the voxel size 0.2 and 0.1 mm. Images retrieved from the hospital database were included in the study. The relationship of root apices of maxillary third molar with the MS was assessed according to the vertical, horizontal and Winter’s classification. Descriptive statistics, t test and chi-square test of association were applied.

CBCT scans of 93 patients, 56 males and 37 females were evaluated. The mean age was 41.12±17.13 years. The mean distance of third molar roots to the MS wall was 2.38±1.54 mm for males and 1.86±1.04 mm for females, on the left and 2.67±1.81 mm for males and 2.58±1.54 mm in females, on the right side. Independent sample t test showed that there was no significant difference for third molar to sinus wall distance in the two genders. No significant difference was found between the two sides.

In a sub-population of Pakistani adults, the mean distance between the roots of the upper third molar and MS wall is around 2 mm. Only 5% males and 8% females had their upper third molars roots protruding into the MS.

To compare and assess the enamel surface roughness by Atomic Force Microscopy between ceramic and metal brackets after adhesive removal with 3 different methods.

90 extracted premolars were collected and divided equally into 3 groups G, Y, and R. With group G bonded with metallic brackets (using primer and Transbond XT), group Y with ceramic brackets (primer and Transbond XT), and group R with ceramic brackets (silane and Transbond XT). Each group was subdivided into 3 sub-groups (10 premolars each) based on the resin removal method as A: 12- flute tungsten carbide (TC) bur (high speed), B: 12- flute TC bur (low speed), and C: 30 flute TC bur (low speed). Surface roughness values were calculated and compared before bonding and also after adhesive removal by atomic force microscope (AFM). Measured data were analyzed using paired student t-test, ANOVA, and Tukey’s tests.

Among the groups, group G showed increased surface roughness after debonding compared to group Y and group R, with Rq value showing a statistically significant difference (P<0.047). Whereas, within the subgroups, subgroup A (12-flute TC, high speed) with Rq showed increased surface roughness which was found to be statistically significant (P<0.042).

None of the adhesive removal methods was capable to restore the enamel to its earlier morphology; a statistically significant increase in surface roughness parameters was reported with a high-speed 12 flute TC bur for Rq and Rt.

This study investigated the effects of different acidic solutions used as the final irrigation on the push-out bond strength (PBS) of resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers.

100 single root and canal human incisors were selected and decorated. Root canal shaping was done with ProTaper Next rotary files up to X4 and rinsed with 5 mL of 5.25% NaOCl between each file. Then, teeth were divided into five main groups according to the final irrigation (n=20). Group 1: glycolic acid; Group 2: phosphoric acid; Group 3: citric acid; Group 4: EDTA and group 5: saline. Then, each group was divided into two subgroups according to the canal sealer used (n=10). The groups filled with bioceramic-based sealer (bioserra) were named A, and the groups filled with resin-based sealer (AH Plus) were called B. PBS test was applied to one of the two samples obtained from the coronal third of each root. The data were statistically analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s HSD test (α=0.05).

Statistically, the highest PBS value was obtained in group 2A (4.81±0.03 MPa), which was irrigated with phosphoric acid and filled with bioserra, and the lowest PBS value was obtained in group 5B (1.10±0,03), which was irrigated with saline and filled with AH Plus (P<0.05). There was a statistical difference between all groups except group 1A and group 3A (P<0.05).

The bioceramic-based root canal sealer (bioserra) bond strength is superior to resin-based (AH Plus). Phosphoric acid, glycolic acid, and citric acid can be an alternative to EDTA.

This study aimed to measure the shear bond strength and compressive strength of orthodontic adhesives at different curing times and intensities.

Ninety extracted human premolars were used. Orthodontic brackets were bonded on the buccal surface of the teeth with orthodontic adhesive light-cured using VRN-VAFU LED curing light at different curing times (1, 3 and 5 seconds) and intensities (1000, 1600 and 2300 mW/cm2 ). A universal testing machine was used to measure the shear bond strength. The ratio of the adhesive remnant and compressive strength of the orthodontic adhesive, at each curing time at the different intensities, were also evaluated. The results were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test.

The lowest bond strength values (6.4, 9.9 and 12.6 MPa) were recorded with 1000 mW/ cm2 intensity (at all curing times) in comparison with the other intensities (P<0.05). Increasing the curing time significantly increased the bond strength of the orthodontic brackets (P<0.05), except when the curing time was increased from 3 sec to 5 sec at 1600 mW/cm2 intensity. The highest compressive strength values (130.3, 147.1 and 174 MPa) were recorded at 2300 mW/ cm2 intensity (at all curing times) compared to the other intensities (P<0.05). The highest values of the ratio of the adhesive remnants were recorded at 1000 mW/cm2 intensity (at all curing times) compared to the other intensities (P<0.05).

Although, increasing the curing time and\or the curing intensity has a positive effect on the bond strength and compressive strength of the orthodontic adhesive, it might be possible to suggest reducing the curing time of orthodontic adhesive to 1 sec at curing intensity of 2300 mW/cm2 .

Photobiomodulation (PBM) may be prescribed after dental surgery to accelerate tissue healing and improve implant stability. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of LED-PBM on the dental implant osseointegration.

A total of 48 implants (KontactTM) were inserted in 8 Yucatan minipigs (6 implants per minipig) divided into 2 groups (test and control). The test group received LED-PBM with a total energy of 124.2 J/cm2 delivered over 4 sessions (at day0, day+8, day+15 and day+28) lasting 12 minutes each. At day+28, all animals were sacrificed, and their mandibles removed to perform histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Implant osseointegration was evaluated using the computation of bone/implant contact (BIC) index and bone surface/total surface (BS/ TS) ratio. The groups were compared using Student’s unpaired t test.

BIC index and BS/TS ratio were significantly higher within the test group as compared to the control group (P<0.01). Histologic observations on bone tissues demonstrated that LED-PBM may improve and accelerate dental implant osseointegration: 25% of dental implants analyzed within the test group were completely osseointegrated, versus 12.5% within the control group.

This experimental study indicates that LED-PBM contributes to enhancing implant treatment outcomes.

Bonding is an important step in fixed orthodontic therapy and evaluation of bracket bond failures while using different bonding systems is required. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare bracket failure rates of a novel no primer adhesive with conventional primer-based orthodontic adhesives.

This split mouth study was conducted among fifteen patients who underwent therapy with fixed orthodontic appliances using metal brackets. Total of 300 brackets were bonded and the bracket bond failure rates were assessed at the end of 3 months. The difference in bond failure rates between the two groups were assessed in different teeth. Descriptive statistics and chi-square test was performed.

Evaluation of bracket bond failure rates showed a higher incidence of bond failures in the group bonded with the primerless adhesive (6.3%) compared to conventional adhesive (2.3%) but there was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). No intergroup difference was found in the bracket failure rates of individual teeth (P>0.05).

Higher incidence of bond failures were noted with brackets bonded with primerless adhesive when compared to primer-based adhesive but no significant difference was noted over a period of 3 months. Mandibular canine and premolars had a higher bracket failure rate with no significant difference between the adhesives.

Numbing the area of oral mucosa with cold application prior to administration of regional anesthesia has been widely used by various dentists in alleviating pain caused by needle prick. Cryoanesthesia using Endo-ice as topical anesthesia has been studied as a replacement to prevail the fallibility of topical anaesthetics. This study aimed to evaluate and compare effectiveness of ethyl chloride spray with 5% lidocaine gel in alleviating buccal anesthesia injection pain.

Total of 90 outpatients were randomly divided into 3 groups as follows: Group 1 – cryotherapy with ethyl chloride at the anesthetic site preceding before administration of local anesthesia; Group 2 – topical application of 5% LIDOCAINE GEL preceding before administration of local anesthesia; and group 3 – control that did not receive any topical agent preceding before administration of local anesthesia. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to document pain immediately after injection prick.

About comparison of pain scores, significant difference was found between group 1 (ethyl chloride) and group 2 (topical lidocaine) patients (P=0.001). For group 1, about 15 (50%) patients suffered from mild pain, followed by 14 (46.67%) patients suffering from moderate pain. However, majority of the 21 (70%) patients in group 2 suffered from moderate pain. All the patients in group 3 suffered from severe pain.

Importance of alleviating fear of needle injection phobia amongst patients is of paramount importance. Ethyl chloride was found to be more effective than topical lidocaine in alleviating needle injection pain before administration of local anesthetic injection.

There are several invasive dental procedures that require local anesthetics. However, its infiltration is usually associated with anxiety and fear, increasing the perception of pain in pediatric patients. For this reason, it is important to evaluate different strategies for its application. We compared the anesthetic effect of the administration of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:80000 non-alkalized at slow speed and alkalized at fast speed to block the inferior alveolar nerve in deciduous molars.

A crossover clinical trial was carried out whose sample consisted of 38 patients between 6-10 years who required bilateral pulp treatment in their first mandibular primary molars. At the first appointment, they received 2% lidocaine with 1:80000 alkalinized epinephrine administered at a fast rate, and at the second appointment, 2% lidocaine with 1:80000 non-alkalized epinephrine administered at a low speed. We evaluated the onset of action, duration of the anesthetic effect, and intensity of pain during its infiltration.

We found that non-alkalized lidocaine at slow speed had a shorter onset time of action (57.21±22.21 seconds) and longer duration of effect (170.82±43.75 minutes) compared to administration of alkalinized lidocaine at fast speed (74.03±22.09 seconds, 148.24±36.24 minutes, respectively). There was no difference in the level of pain intensity.

In this study, the slow administration of the non-alkalized local anesthetic showed a shorter onset time of action and a longer duration of the anesthetic effect in comparison with the alkalized local anesthetic administered at a rapid rate in the blockade of the inferior alveolar nerve in deciduous molars.

Oral manifestations in patients with COVID-19 have already been reported in the literature. Determining whether the oral manifestations in these cases are directly related to SARS-CoV-2 infection or not has been challenging for both clinicians and researchers, although at present it has not been possible to prove. There are several possible causes for the development of the oral lesions in patients with COVID-19, among them are, opportunistic infections, drug reactions, iatrogenic and those directly related to viral infection. The present work describes the main characteristics of 10 severe COVID-19 hospitalized patients with oral manifestations. By analyzing the characteristics of the reported patients, and what is published in the literature, we conclude that for this series of cases the manifestations are not directly related to SARS-CoV-2, however, it is a possibility that should be considered for all patients.