نشریه اندیشه سیاسی در اسلام
پیاپی 34 (زمستان 1401)

Throughout the history of Islam, many scholars have been prominent in the field of jurisprudence or other Islamic teachings and spiritual conduct, but the personality of Imam Khomeini cannot be defined in a single frame and format, and he is only a jurist, a philosopher, or a mystic, etc. knew In addition to being comprehensive, his personality was also complete. His scientific works, which are available to us, can confirm this and outline his scientific dimensions for us. His thoughts and views have a trans-temporal and trans-spatial validity and have still maintained their validity, and this has shown his deep and all-round awareness, which has caused the impact and fruition of the Islamic military.Imam Khomeini was not a scholar away from society and he considered political activities as a part of his religious duties and with this view he embarked on a fundamental and revolutionary Islamic transformation. The main question of the research is that from his point of view as a revolutionary person, which component is the most effective in education, evolution and reaching human goals. After understanding what this component is, which is the uprising of Allah, we have listed the different dimensions and examples of this uprising.To reach this goal, we have used the descriptive-analytical method by referring to Imam's words. Our findings show that in Imam's thought, the rise of God is on one hand the support and on the other hand the axis of all the intellectual and belief foundations of Mobin religion and the holy Islamic law. This uprising has various affairs, which starts with the struggle against the ego and continues with the uprising against ignorance and division, and by resorting to reason, knowledge and unity, it leads to the uprising against the external tyranny and the formation of the government. A government that tries to create a new Islamic civilization, in addition to presenting a model of Islamic standard government to the world, is the foundation of a global unified government and the foundation of the age of emergence.

The government of Etedal appeared in a hopeful social atmosphere and handed over power in an atmosphere of despair and mistrust. The appearance of the government of Etedal, in terms of discourse, was dependent on signifer such as negotiation, tact, expediency, flexibility, rationality, reality and moderation. There was. However, public approval declined shortly after taking office and eventually reached an all-time low. The question is, can the trend of Etedal in Hassan Rouhani's government be considered as a discourse? And what will be the consequences of emptying the signifiers of this discourse? The hypothesis is that because the main signifiers of the current of moderation were emptied of their meanings for some reason, the discourse articulation process was not completed and the discourse stabilization did not take place; Therefore, the flow of moderation cannot be considered a discourse. The consequence of not stabilizing the discourse of moderation and marginalization of moderate discourses can lead to an increase in the gap between the people and the government and lead to progressive antagonism by reducing social trust and hope.

The political philosophy of the Neosadras is one of the dominant jurisprudential readings of Iranian politics. Javadi Amoli is one of the neo-Sadras whose political philosophy has influenced the philosophy of Iran. The present research deals with this issue. Our central question is to examine how the political philosophy of Javadi Amoli has an effect on the philosophical and political debates of contemporary Iran, with an emphasis on the distinction between politics and the political. Our hypothesis is that Javadi Amoli plans his discussions about politics with an existential and aesthetic view of the political matter, which is based on the appointment of the appointed jurist. The results of the investigations showed that the basis of his political philosophy is based on the aesthetic axis, at the head of politics in his opinion is the most knowledgeable jurist of the age who has been appointed by God, and the Assembly of Experts is responsible for determining the knowledge of such a jurist. is in charge because the selection of a guardian by the people under the guardianship was never imaginable.

A Research into Certain Predictions Concerning the Islamic Revolution and Imam Khomeini’s LeadershipThis essay deals with the following question: did the predictions about Imam Khomeini and his leadership in the Islamic Revolution have a role in the victory of the Revolution? In this paper, we assume that human interactions are not necessarily based on rational considerations, but religious beliefs and, in some contexts, even cultural milieu may set a ground that one accepts metaphysical claims. Some of these beliefs say that there are gifted people who in the light of God’s grace and through contemplation and spiritual journey are able to predict the future. There are such predictions about the Islamic Revolution. Our findings show that certain people through their predictions had been able to have an effect on society’s beliefs and were effective in the victory of the Islamic Revolution.Keywords: Imam Khomeini, prediction, Islamic Revolution, the Unseen

The formation of the Islamic Republic of Iran based on Velayat-e-Faqih is one of the achievements of Imam Khomeini in the field of jurisprudence and politics. Rational and mystical has proved Velayat-e-Faqih, this article tries to answer the question how Imam Khomeini has proved Velayat-e-Faqih with different epistemological approaches and has mixed it?Findings show that Imam Khomeini proves the principle of Velayat-e-Faqih in three ways according to the position of Velayat-e-Faqih. In books such as Velayat-e-Faqih and Al-Bayy, he has referred to the rational-narrative approach with reference to it, and in his mystical books, he has proved Velayat-e-Faqih with an intuitive approach.Findings show that Imam Khomeini proves the principle of Velayat-e-Faqih in three ways according to the position of Velayat-e-Faqih. In books such as Velayat-e-Faqih and Al-Bayy, he has referred to the rational-narrative approach with reference to it, and in his mystical books, he has proved Velayat-e-Faqih with an intuitive approach.

The popularity of the divine government, in other words the influence of the popular vote on the legitimacy of the divine ruling in religious societies, especially in Islamic societies, has always been a subject of controversy among religious scholars and power-holders in political systems based on religion.In this field, in order to justify and justify their opinion, they have tried to rely on religious sources and texts and on Muslim scholars on the Qur'an and the tradition of the Prophet and the Imams. One of the most important cases of religious sovereignty in the sacred system of the Islamic Republic and among the most important religious sources in this regard is Nahj al-Balagha.The present study uses a descriptive-analytical method to analyze the Imam Khomeini's speeches and to compare Imam Khomeini's speeches with that of the Imam Khomeini.You invited me and I was not interested in the caliphate"and the theoretical and practical adherence of Imam Khomeini is that such statements as"Even if people vote against their own will, that vote will determine the status of the nation. Was and has emergedThe popularity of the divine government, in other words the influence of the popular vote on the legitimacy of the divine ruling in religious societies, especially in Islamic societies, has always been a subject of controversy among religious scholars and power-holders in political systems based on religion.In this field, in order to justify and justify their opinion, they have tried to rely on religious sources and texts and on Muslim scholars on the Qur'an and the tradition of the Prophet and the Imams. One of the most important cases of religious sovereignty in the sacred system of the Islamic Republic and among the most important religious sources in this regard is Nahj al-Balagha.The present study uses a descriptive-analytical method to analyze the Imam Khomeini's speeches and to compare Imam Khomeini's speeches with that of the Imam Khomeini.You invited me and I was not interested in the caliphate"and the theoretical and practical adherence of Imam Khomeini is that such statements as"Even if people vote against their own will