نشریه الحوکمه فی القرآن و السنه
پیاپی 1 (شتاء 2023)

Obedience and disobedience are basic concepts of governance. These two concepts, from an affirmative perspective, provide a set of obligations for the citizens, and from a negative perspective, introduce a set of dos and don'ts. Therefore, understanding the meta-theory and the fundamental basis in different governance systems can formulate the philosophy of dos and don'ts in obedience and disobedience. In this article, the meaning of "religious construction of Qur'anic politics and governance" is the set of requirements and tasks that the Holy Qur'an has presented in the field of politics and governance and has asked believers to adhere to these requirements and tasks in this arena. The main concern of this article is to present the religious boundaries of obedience and disobedience in Qur'anic governance. The findings of the article suggest that in the light of Qur'anic governance, it is possible to infer the necessity of obeying God, the Prophet and Ulu al-Amr (Those vested with authority) in legislation and governance from an affirmative point of view and present its political requirements. From a negative point of view, obeying groups such as heedless, infidels, hypocrites, corruptors, etc. as an act of haram (forbidden), can be deduced and presented in Qur'anic governance, so that in the light of these dos and don'ts, the religious boundaries of politics based on the Quran are extracted and become the basis of action.

Examining the role and place of the right to criticize in Islamic governance from the perspective of the Holy Qur'an, which is the main source of political thought, is of great importance. A factor can speed up the progress of Islamic society, since in Islamic governance, citizens are of the most effective forces, and a major part of accepting their participation in the process of power is possible by recognizing their right of criticism. This article seeks to examine the place of the right of criticism in Islamic governance and its role in providing political freedom from the perspective of the Holy Qur'an. In the hypothesis, it has been emphasized that according to the infrastructures of Quranic thought such as the necessity of preserving human dignity, preserving moral values and the possibility of errors made by agents, and it should be kept in mind that the role of criticism in Islamic governance to provide political freedom can be observed in issues such as the presence of a group of critics, the acceptance of free criticism, and the necessity of fair criticism; And things like dependence on habits, dogmatism, prejudice and the idea of infallibility are major obstacles to achieving the right of criticism in Islamic governance. This important issue has been examined by referring to the Holy Qur'an and interpretive narratives through the method of ijtihadi interpretation.

Access to peace and tranquility and living in a peaceful environment away from war and conflict has been one of the highest aspirations of humans. In order to achieve this goal, many measures have been taken at the international level, including the prohibition of resorting to force, identifying the preservation of international peace and security as the first goal and one of the most important principles of the United Nations Charter, efforts to disarm, development of economic and trade relations and the like. Although these measures have been relatively successful, they have not led to complete success. One of the important measures in this regard is to recognize "peace" as a "human right" under the title "right to peace" and under the categories of "rights of solidarity". This issue raises questions; perhaps the most important question is, basically, on what basis can the recognition of the "right to peace" be justified? To answer this question, justice can be mentioned as a solid basis for considering "peace" as a "human right", and by referring to it, from the perspective of international documents and the verses of the Holy Qur'an, the right to peace can be proved. The present article has evaluated this hypothesis by using library data and using the analytical descriptive method and in a comparative way from the perspective of international documents and the verses of the Holy Qur'an, in the form of an introduction and three speeches.

This research focuses on the examination of the semantic and thematic field of the political interpretation of the Qur'an in the thought of Professor Motahari. The present study aims to provide a structured presentation of the way of thematic classification and the type of semantic perception in the field of political interpretation of the Qur'an from the perspective of Professor Motahari. The research method has been the combined model of theory of semantic field (Izutsu) and thematic approach (Professor Sadr). It shows an aspect of Motahari's analysis including a holistic view and semantic analysis and coexistence of chain, continuous and sometimes mutual concepts. Another type, the thematic approach, reflects the way of analyzing the words themselves, and it has been formed by combining the two, based on the characteristics of thought and based on the analysis of facts and social issues with a hierarchy of Qur'anic topics and the analysis of Quranic meanings (including government, management, revolution , justice, freedom, etc.). (Hypothesis) In Motahari's structured approach through using Qur'anic verses, the political aspects of man are considered as functions of the social aspect of human, and in the semantic and thematic analysis, one should pay attention to the difference between modern social political concepts and Qur'anic concepts. (Findings)