دکتر نسرین فقیه ملک مرزبان

One of the topics that has long received attention in our religious Quranic verses, and narrations, and has consequently found its way into our literary and mystical texts, is the subject of self-struggle. Examining Direct Quotes (DS) is one way of representing speech and thought. Asrar al-Tawhid, the subject of which is the sayings and states of Abu Sa'id Abu al-Khair, the prominent mystic of the fourth and fifth centuries (357-440), was written by one of his descendants named Muhammad ibn Munawwar. The book contains the accounts and statements either directly attributed to Abu Sa’id or reported by others about him, and includes important topics in Sufism. In this study, we aim to study the dialogic atmosphere (physical context), the syntactic construction, and the strategic plan of the quotations cited directly from Abu Sa'id in Asrar al-Tawhid by Muhammad ibn Munawwar, using library sources and a descriptive-analytical method. We will analyze these quotations to gain insights into Abu Sa'id's intellectual system regarding the struggle against the self.  The findings of the research show that contrary to some ideological deviations apparent in the manners of Abu Sa'id in Asrar al-Tawhid regarding issues such as pilgrimage (hajj), mystic listening, asceticism, and austerity, when it comes to the struggle against the self, there is not only no deviation, but it is entirely consistent with religious teachings, Quranic principles, and beliefs of the jurists and legislators.

Hafez is not a poet like Khajoo that apply a word in his poem, merely in order to create double entendre, and He is not follow Khaghani's way in paling the grace of poem through abundance of scientific expression. Rather his poem is balanced synthesis of scientific aspect of word with poetical dimension of speech. Hi use this rhetorical figure (ihām) on the basis of his detailed Knowledge about scientific texts. So it is necessary to survey the series of couplets which have scientific background, considering every aspect. Our hypothesis is that, there is no sort of conventional word-play thing in such couplets. Although most of our medieval knowledge in comparison to modern sciences are almost nothing, in most cases the speech of poets like Khaghani and Hafez is exactly according to the facts of those ages. In this paper as an instance, meanwhile paying a complete attention to the variant readings and Hafez poetic art also by getting help from common scientific texts of the Hafez age, we have critically edited some couplets of Hafez. If this method receive verification from Hafezian scholars, we can be hopeful that it can be effective and solving in other cases of Divan-e Hafez.

So far Hafezian scholars have enumerated various factors in creation of different variants of Hafez poems. The nature of different variants at the first step is studied considering this aspects: whether these reforms were made by the poet himself? Have the scribes had any influence in its formation? Or other factors than these two have been the source of different variants? Hafez researchers believe that the most important determinant of different variants is not the scribes errors and mistakes, but they are related to the following agents: Unwillingness of Hafez to collect his poems The evolutionary rudiments of his aesthetical points of view The socio-political situations of his time Changing of individual and particular cases into general We can expand this list by two important points: The evolution of Hafez knowledge: Perhaps the evolution of Hafez knowledge in different branches of science of his time has been a reason for the substitution of some of the variants. Hafez textual researches: This factor can be the one of main and the most effective reasons of different variants. Therefore intertextuality will be the authentic method in critical edition of Hafez’s poem. Goals: “The establishment of a reliable text” of Divan-e Hafez -like his poem and character- is an exception in the world of text edition. For edition of Divan-e Hafez it is not the scientific method to collate one particular copy of divan with other manuscripts and note the variants in the footnotes without any critical review. On the contrary, for each different variant several explanatory essays are necessary, these notes along with paying attention to the different versions of manuscripts and exploring aesthetical and rhetorical aspects of Hafez’s poem should be assessed totally, and only in this case -maybe- it is possible to perceive Hafez’s mind and language. This burden is heavy enough to be carried by only one person, that is to say it is necessary for the scholars to research the various layers of Hafez’s multiplanar poem from a special angle where the differences exist. This article is -we hope- a small step in that direction.

In process of creation of art works, Hafez does not believe in “beginning from nothing”. He is the poet of selections and motivations. Instead of using his mind power for creation of art works at the same level, as the poets before his time, through literary critical criterions, which he has learned at the schools of rhetoric and poetic specialists, he strains “Persian/Arabic texts in literary as well as in scientific fields” and as an eloquent poet, selects what he approves of mentally and linguistically, and recreates by exceeding artistic genius values, his knowledge and reflecting incidents of his time. In the process of researching the textual relationships between Hafez poem and Persian/Arabic poetry/prose as well as scientific texts, it turns out that throughout his life time, he has been researching on these resources. There are evidences in the Divan-e Hafez which show that some of the different variants have a root in his researches in scientific texts. For example: حیلت / حالت / طاقت کوه اندوه فراقت به چه حیلت بکشد حافظ خسته که از ناله تنش چون نالی است (Hafez,1387Š: 129) Varian Readings in Hafez’ Qazals (Neisari, 1385Š vol.1:291): حیلت :based on 31 manuscripts→ oldest one: Hagia Sophia dated 813 A.H./1410 A.D. حالت :based on 2 manuscripts→ oldest one: Khalkhali dated 827 A.H./1424 A.D. طاقت :based on 2 manuscripts→ oldest one: dated 817-34 A.H./1414-31 A.D. حیلت:based on The Oldest Manuscript of Divan-i Hafiz dated 801A.H./1398-99A.D. (Hafez,1394Š:14) QB: حالت‖PNSEJ: حیلت Hilat (حیلت) in this line is a single word with a double meaning (=ihām) “obvious” and “far-fetched”: 1. Means or Plan 2. Scientific term applied in the knowledge of ingenious mechanical devices (=ilm-ul-hiyalعلم‌الحیل) that refers to the ancient form of modern mechanical engineer.

Although Hafez poem is clear, it has a deep structure which a thorough understanding of his poem and deciphering his “dense poetic language” would not be possible unless through Intertextuality. This principle can be true in editing his poem. In such cases we should use the method of adding up a series of rational, eloquent and narrative reasons for the preference of different variants and critical editions. It is necessary to be noted that while we emphasize Hafez textual researches, we do not ignore his independent individual and original artistic creativity in the formation and completion of his poems.

In this research we try to study and analyze the mystical capacities of Sa’di’s Gulistan of 7th Century AH and search the hidden aspects and lower layers of the text, applying some tools of critical discourse analysis approach. Thus sociological and historical approaches are applied in order to come to a scientific interpretation of the text. Linguistic, social and historical aspects are of so much importance to us when we refer to Sadi's time and society, to reveal hidden ideologies of the text. To this end, Michael Halliday’s theories are used for analyzing the text and Norman Fairclough’s for explaining the social aspects in Gulistan. Among suggested tools, ideational meta-function is applied concentrating on naming and processes. Also according to Fairclough, the text is studied in three levels of description, interpretation and explanation and so the joint between the text and society will be represented. Results show one main discourse named spiritual discourse. Expressing the role and function of participants in the above-mentioned discourse we finally found out that except God as the one participant in spiritual discourse, one can consider a special position for preceptor (Pyr) and mystic (Sahib-del) and recognize them as the most positive poles of Sufis discourse of Gulistan. Darvish is an individual with all kinds of abilities, not necessarily negative or positive.