جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "تاریخ نگاری چپ" در نشریات گروه "تاریخ"

The movement of the Shiite clergy, its influence on the process of contemporary developments in Iran, political and governmental theories, along with the authority and influence of Imam Khomeini's leadership on this movement and its eventual success, were reflected in Iranian left historiography before and after the Islamic Revolution. For the first time, left-wing historians and theorists presented a Marxist-class analysis of the Shiite clergy movement and its theories and practical behaviors before and after the revolution, and based on this ideological view, analyzed, explained, converged and diverged with this current. This research aims to show by a descriptive-analytical approach why and how Iranian left historians and writers, under the influence of their ideological view, analyzed the general endeavors of the clergy, and the influence of Imam Khomeini in the two periods before and after revolution, and from which point of view and according to which ideological criteria, they first made similar analyzes and finally, after the revolution, under the influence of which ideological components, they openly criticized and revealed their deep differences with this current?

The present article discusses the views of Avatis Mikaelian, known as Sultanzadeh, in relation to the developments of contemporary Iranian history. Sultanzadeh is one of the most famous figures of the communist left thinkers in Iran. His ideas played a major role in the strategy and orientation of the Communist Party of Iran from the beginning of its formation until long after the Second Congress. According to Sultanzadeh, the most important problem in Iran is the economic development. He considered the unity of triple factors as the obstacle to the natural process of growth: imperialism, court and feudalism. The method of this article is descriptive-analytical and the main question is what was the difference between Sultanzadeh's view and that of other communist left activists and Soviet academics on the historical process of contemporary Iran. Sultanzadeh tried to analyze and explain the history of Iran based on the internal and global realities of the country based on Marx's doctrines. Accordingly, his views on Iran's economic development, colonization, the jungle movement, and the rise to power of Reza Shah were obvious deviations from the Soviet Communist Party theorists who considered the process of societies to be linear.