جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « عدالت اداری » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

Today, developments in administrative law have given rise to new concepts. In recent decades, administrative law has sought to establish and seek methods and tools that seek to address the needs of administrative affairs and establish an efficient system. In this regard, many countries have adopted laws containing the basic principles and components of administrative law, which is very effective in creating a proper administrative system. "Good governance" is one of these emerging concepts. The present study shows that authoritarian political systems that do not arise from the people's vote and do not see themselves as accountable to the people are the most important factor for corruption in societies and administrative systems. Therefore, in the traditional models of government affairs, in order not to infect the administrative system with corruption, they proposed the theory of separation of the political system from the administrative system, but in the Islamic system, inspired by revelatory teachings, the political system is the basis of the administrative system. The way that health and corruption in the administrative system is affected by the health and corruption of the political system. Also, correct and fair judgment prevents the contamination of government employees and agents with various violations and ensures the health of the apparatus. Islam's special emphasis on securing the rights of judges and monitoring their performance due to the importance of the health of the judiciary on the health of agents Administrative offices.

The present article is a comparative study that compares two institutions of the Court of Administrative Justice of Iran and the Council of State of France. In this comparative study, the author intends to examine the implementation of an important category of administrative justice in the two legal systems of Iran and France in relation to the performance of the two judicial institutions. At first glance, it seems that both institutions have significant commonalities in jurisdiction and litigation. However, in comparison, the significant volume of unresolved cases indicates the fact that the judiciary has not been as successful in achieving administrative justice as its French counterpart. Therefore, following the answer to the reason for this fact, the results of the research show that factors such as length of the process and time of the trial, insufficient performance guarantees, non-compliance of government institutions with the decisions made, etc., are involved in this inefficiency. The data of this article have been collected by comparative-analytical method and library method.

In the early era of Islamic governments, an establishment called DiwÁn-e MaÛalim was responsible for taking care of people’s complaints about the oppressions and injustice exercised by the governmental men of position and the people in power. Taking into account such characteristics as relationship with the highest governmental official and employing powerful and righteous administrators and judges as well as a group of competent consultants have left us an effective and powerful image of an instance of reclaiming the rights of the oppressed people and of putting an end to oppressions. In this article, in addition to casting light on the nature of this social institution, special mention has been made of the aims of establishing this institution. These aims can be recounted as observing people’s rights and making people satisfied with the government and the system of supervising administrators and ranking officials. It has also sought to provide evidence for the fact that the establishment of this institution has been out of urgent necessity in an Islamic government.