Construction of the East Narrating the creation of the other by representation

“Do subordinate can speech?” this Gayatrispivak’s well-known question draws ttention, as a metaphor for the complicated relation between conscious explorer and unconscious subject of subordinate Histories, towards the known and problematized scope of “representation” and “representability”. In the context of such vision, the importance of the vanguard criticism of Edward Saeed about orientalism is investigating how the East is constructed by west, ie; attention to ways of representing affected the other discriminate logic, necessarily superiority / lowliness between itself and the other, that was always absent and it was not possible or it to speak; represent that was done on based on cooperation of knowledge and power. The west, in fact, seizure the east that orientalism was formerly grant mental visualization about it. This essay is seeking draw grant mental visualization about it. The monological orientalist discourse for Alternative knowledge, by deals with the modes of representing the East and traces-back its duration in some contemporary medieval picturing about East.