A study of differences between issues related to principles of jurisprudence and jurisprudential rules
Author(s):
Abstract:
Great experts of principles of jurisprudence have tried to make a distinction between jurisprudential rules and issues related to principles of jurisprudence. The following jurisprudents tried to solve this problem through different approaches; the late Akhund relied on the prevalence of such issues in jurisprudential chapters, the late Khoie tried to make a distinction between commandments and subjective nature of these issues and also between inference and adjustment, the late Hakim focused on dependability of one subject on another or their independence from each other, the late Naini focused on usefulness of these issues for the religious authority and the followers as well as the generality or particularity of the result therein; the late Imam focused on the independence of the issues. Among the said issues, only the viewpoints of Imam Khomeini and the late Akhund can be used as a comprehensive solution to the problem.
Keywords:
Language:
Persian
Published:
Matin, Volume:14 Issue: 55, 2012
Page:
25
magiran.com/p1045559
دانلود و مطالعه متن این مقاله با یکی از روشهای زیر امکان پذیر است:
اشتراک شخصی
با عضویت و پرداخت آنلاین حق اشتراک یکساله به مبلغ 1,390,000ريال میتوانید 70 عنوان مطلب دانلود کنید!
اشتراک سازمانی
به کتابخانه دانشگاه یا محل کار خود پیشنهاد کنید تا اشتراک سازمانی این پایگاه را برای دسترسی نامحدود همه کاربران به متن مطالب تهیه نمایند!
توجه!
- حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران میشود.
- پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانههای چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمیدهد.
In order to view content subscription is required
Personal subscription
Subscribe magiran.com for 70 € euros via PayPal and download 70 articles during a year.
Organization subscription
Please contact us to subscribe your university or library for unlimited access!