The moral skepticism of the Epistomolgy

In this study, the significant role of epistemological moral skepticism in the overall context of the philosophical schools, and the types of arguments and criticism on the part of the study will be discussed. The importance and aim of this study which has been done through library research, is to check the exact types and attributes of the epistemological moral skepticism, and some of its arguments along with the criticisms posed against it. Epistemological moral skepticism, as ultra-moral view, investigates and critically discusses the moral knowledge. Academic moral skepticism and pyrhonie moral skepticism are two subcategories of Epistemological moral skepticism. Academic moral skepticism presenting arguments such as regress argument and other skeptical assumptions concludes that none of us has moral knowledge since none of our cognitions is supported by complete, positive and magnified perception. But pyrhonie skepticism suspends the sentences and claims that we do not know whether our beliefs are justified or not? The decision to admit or deny the existence of justified beliefs, may encounter some defects that we cannot avoid.