The research of polemic belief impact of Muslim historians on simulation between Caliph's wars and Prophet Ones

The orientalists have always accused Islam and the great prophet to harshness. Based on some Quran verses and historical records on the conflict between prophet and his opponents, they tried to represent rough picture of Islam and prophet (p.b.u.h). On the other hand, the Muslim scholars also tried to answer the aforesaid argument that seems has been successful to disprove harshness of Islam and Quran. But it still has not properly given answer to the prophet encounter with his opponents. In other word, this answer is not able to remove all accusation and doubt about the prophet encounter with his opponents. Author thinks that the three following points challenge the aforesaid accusation: A.The necessity of the attention to commission and appearance of prophet in creditable that is as indisputable verses of prophetic method in conflict with opponents. As a result it is necessary to evaluate the credit of historical narratives to the mentioned indisputable verses. B.The necessity of the attention to nature and character of historical records that is representative of degree of confidence and rely to themThe necessity of the attention to the accomplished simulation between caliphs’ wars and prophet’s conflicts with their opponents that it is representative of the occurred confusion between caliphs’ behavior and prophet one with opponents. In other word, the Muslim historians have attributed the caliphs’ behavior with their opponents to prophet conduct with his opponents and accordingly they caused to occur this accusation.