Ahl Bayt And Their Opposition With Tafvisism: Their Criticism Of Tafvisism Along With Their Criticism Of Jabrisim

logical opinion of rejecting Jabr among Shia was propagated along side avoiding falling into the deep abyss of Tafvisisim. This leads to preparing a comprehensive answer. In the present article, it is made clear that “Jabr” and “tafviz” are connected to the meaning of “rulership” of human beings and God over mankind’s deliberate acts. In addition, it becomes clear that putting “rulership of God over free human beings” and "rulership of free human beings over the domain of his wills” besides eachother has made a long problem for mankind. Those who take God’s rulership turn into Jabrism and those who take rulership of mankind turn into Tafvisism. While Ahl Bayt did not know these two opposite of each other, but asserted on them both. As it is explained in this article, though, Tafvisism believe the same as Shia in some logical domains like proving rulership of human beings on themselves (rejecting Jabr) but in some other logical domains like respecting vast endless rulership of God on human beings (rejecting tafviz) becomes far from Shia; as the expression “la jabr” by Ahlul Bayt, distinguished Shia from other groups like Ashaere, the expression “la Tafviz” distinguished them from Motazale. In this article, after explanation of the relationship between “rejecting Tafviz” and “proving God’s rulership” and pointing to the weakness of Ghadariye and Motazale in rejecting Tafviz , some examples of traditions of Ahlul Bayt confirming their opposition with “jabr” and “Tafviz” have been offered.