Juridical and legal bases of organ transplant about sentenced to retaliation and Hodud after execution the verdict

Implementation of punishment is the most important issues in Islamic criminal law, but order of some issues have not stated explicitly among them organ transplant about sentenced to retaliation and Hodud after execution the verdict.
The famous Shia jurists believe that the method of penalty enforcement is not matter and organ separation is enough to prove the right of retaliation. In contrast, some other jurists know the amputation is cause of retaliation and believe that equality and dignity in the quality and method of penalty enforcement with the committed crime is required. There are different opinions about the impossibility of transplant of amputated limb in Hodud enforcement, some believe that the object is penalty enforcement so amputated limb is transplantable. In contrast some believe that the object of amputation is a lesson for offender and other people and because it is incompatible with the wisdom of God order, transplant is not acceptable. In this paper with study the juridical and legal aspects, the possibility of organ transplant about sentenced person after execution the verdict.