Comparative study of negotiating strategy with current and non-aligned countries from the viewpoint of both the conservative and reformist

The strategy of negotiating with countries and currents incompatible with the policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran has led to the quarreling of political policies and political movements within the country over the past two decades and has led two fundamentalist and reformist movements to realize their policies, Confronted. Hence, the question is, what is the attitude of each of the two strands to this strategy?.
The autopsy of the nature, goals, barriers, power sources, and characteristics of the negotiators in this strategy by descriptive-analytic method indicates that the principled flow defines non-cohesive countries in its value system and believes that this dialogue is a value Pending. On the other hand, the reformist trend points to diplomatic advocacy as a sign of political life in the international system, and believes that negotiation and dialogue can eliminate hostilities.