The Positive Condition: from Pure Duty to Indebtedness the Effects of the Positive condition in Imamieh jurisprudence and Iranian law

The Imamieh scholars have wide disputes over the substantial effect of positive condition. Some jurisprudents regard the positive condition as lacking postural effect, believing it as merely an imperative rule. A group takes the path of extremism assuming it as an effect of debt, while other group reduces the postural right of positive condition to "right of demanding. Moreover, a group has taken a moderate approach, considering a postural effect for positive condition. They regard it as one of the types of financial right. The researcher names it financial covenanted right, believing that in some occasion, it turns to financial obligational right, which is debt. Iran's civil law doesnt take clear position, and this necessitates a precise explanation of the effect of positive condition in Imamieh's jurisprudence, which has been the source of the legislative adoption. Therefore, the present study uses a in this descriptive-analytical approach to explain the views and reasons of each group and to reveal the position and basis of civil law.