The Ethics of Dialogue in the Quran and Hadith; Emphasizing the Debates of Imam Reza (AS)

The age of Imam Reza (AS) is the golden age of dialogue and debate and proof of the superiority of the Quranic teachings of Islam and in particular Shiite teachings and doctrine of Imamate, a period in which religion requires a living and uplifting mediator between the creature and the creator. In this time Imam Razavi's (AS) debates are about offering Ahl al-Bayt's thoughts. This research has been investigated Imam Reza's most important debates with various religions in which Sheikh Sadukh (RA) has outlined them in the book of "Eyoun Akhbar al-Reza" in eight parliaments; after the presentation of the criterion of the right and wrong contention from the view of the verses and narrations, with the aim of discovering the ethics of the debate; exclusively with an emphasis on the abandonment of contention during the debate with the opponent, also with a special emphasis on non-insulting rivals- which is the most important of ethical observance in practices.
This paper on the method of gathering materials uses libraries, and on the site of the data, follows attribution style. And the method of analysis of accounts receivable is Descriptive analysis.
The results of the survey indicate that in Imam Reza's two important debates with various religions; seventeen cases appear to be apparently insulting the rival.
None of the seventeen seemingly immoral behavior is not anti-moral acts, and they are not against Islamic jurisprudence; some of these actions include: attributing ignorance to the audience; attributing wrong to the audience; attributing obsession to the audience; attribute the similarity with the Jew to the audience; Attributing "Weil" and "Vieh" to the audience and laughing at the audience.