Analysis pilgrimage priority or necessity of dedication in the event of conflict

One of mrjhaty in the conflict to favor one of the two mtzahm given priority when that must be the first priority in terms of time on recent obligation. In this case, some scholars have issued a fatwa in the priority vow and if you can afford Some people vow to disband and hand the case in question beyond the scope of known tkhssa and some power derived not accept the Hajj as religious power.
In this paper, a complete analysis of the arguments of the parties have explained that criticisms of the priority given to vow a vow should know prior to the act of Hajj the point is neglected and that "elevated when" when as little disturbance of the relevant there is no other property that later would prefer and here on the premise that conflict to accept the Hajj later, it is still important because of the characteristics that would make the pilgrimage should be on the front vow because the mere existence causes Takd elevated in severe criteria of necessity is not in dispute.