A Comparative Approach to the Phenomenon of Semantic Multiplicity in Persian and Arabic Text Given the Pluralism Theory in Understanding Ricoeur Text

Regarding to the pluralism theory in the understanding of Paul Ricoeur's text, the present study tries to prove that in Arabic and Persian texts, along with the theory of "monopolistic Intentionalism", which is nowadays accepted by the commentators, for the text, there are several correct meanings that go beyond the author's intention. It is considered that the possibility of specifying the meanings of meaningful meanings of the text is also possible using the "criteria for verifying commentary" such as "explanation", "legitimacy", "match", "fit", and "compatibility". Hence, using the "criteria for verifying the interpretation", there could be multiple transcriptions of interpretations (not contradictory, interpretations) of texts, and in the shadow of it, it was preserved from relativity, anarchism. Therefore, the present article, which is carried out in a descriptive-analytical manner with the gathering of documentary and paperwork, concludes that the theory of pluralism in understanding Paul Ricoeur's text, given the simultaneous attention to the textual capacities and the intellectual capacities of the commentators, leads to the hypothesis "inclusive Intentionalism and moderate subjectivism", which, in the face of the same negation, is "monopolistic intentionalism and radical subjectivism", and has shifted the central theoretical interpretation.