A Comparative Study of the Arabic Textbook of Ibn-e-Moghafe with the Persian Text of Nasrollah Monshi and the Stories of Bidpay (Case Study, Bob Hammah Almaqtah)

The original version of Indian-Kelileh va Demneh was Sanskrit. This book is one of the works that has not been limited to a particular nation and has been translated into different tribes. Some scholars believe that Kelileh va Demneh is the source of the emergence of comparative literature. Due to the validity of these texts, the present article first gives a definition of the structure and content, then the linguistic and the elements of the book, and the introduction of Nasrallah Monshi, the Arabic version of Ibn Moghaf and then the story. It examines the strength of Bid Pay by Bokhari and highlights similarities and differences based on the American perspective in comparative literature. The result of this is that these three works are linguistically and rhetorically different, and sometimes different, and the language is wide in the text of Nasrallah, the text of Ibn Moghafa is more abounded with metonymies, the text of Ibn Moghafa is easy and true, like the text of Bokhari; Nasrallah Monshi, with the tendency towards the technical prose, has used abundance, balance, and shrine, and therefore has abundance; but the text of Ibn Moghfa, is based on prose and the stories of Bid Pay have a simple and fluid text, and the prose of Monshi, is a great example of technical prose. In the lexical category, the stories of Bidpay are richer and wider than the texts of Nasrallah Monshi and Ibn-e-Moghafa.