Jurisprudential Study of the Effect of Honor on the Process of Criminal Proceedings Related to Others’ Rights (Haq ul-Naas)

In many criminal proceedings the honor of people is at risk. Since honor has a lot of personal and social effects, and Shariah endeavors to preserve the honor of individuals, and according to other arguments and rules in jurisprudence, such as: the la zarar principle, the principle of the individuality of criminal liability, etc. and since the reasons for the lack of influence of honor, such as the effort of religious law in the rights of others (haq ul-naas), justice in the proceedings, consensus, etc. are not sufficient, it is proven that if the common procedure related to human right leads to a harm coming to the honor of an individual or individuals, despite the effort of religious law to the rights of others, the judge is required to conduct the procedure within a framework that prevents harming the honor. If it is not possible to prevent this harm, due to the interference with the necessity of proceedings and the necessity of maintaining honor, it is necessary to act in accordance with the rule of interference.