Hesitation in the authenticity and credibility of Confessions to Sexual Crimes

By confessing the perpetrator to commit a crime with a certain person (In adultery or sodomy) exactly another crime is posed as Qazf. On the other hand, if one does not confess to commit adultery or sodomy, Basically, the occurrence of a double crime of adultery or sodomy will remain in patent ambiguity. Hence, the validity and credibility of confessions in sexual crimes have some problems in the judicious definition that the legislator did in 2013. Therefore, the discussion of the issue of proving evidence in sexual crimes, despite the well-known jurisprudential point of view of the importance of having this evidence, is an entry to exit from this legislative crisis Also, Abu Hanifa's theory that no adultery is carried out without victim that among the Sunni jurists is also an opportunity to present different views in the analogous jurisprudence.