Confronting Shiite and Salafi-Brotherhood Discourse on Traditional West Asian Security Arrangements

The leading work tries to present a realistic analysis of the nature of the resistance (Shiite) discourse competition in opposition to the Salafist and Brotherhood discourses in the West Asian strategy, using a descriptive analytical approach and applying applied considerations. Therefore, the question that the authors of the present research are seeking to answer is why it has been arranged that the effects of the resistance discourse (Shi'ite) on Western-security security in the face of Salafist and Brotherhood discourses are evaluated? The hypothesis that comes from the above question is that, following recent transformations, Shiite Resistance discourse against the Salafist discourse and the Brotherhood have managed to bring the Islamic and revolutionary countries present in the strategic West Asia region both in form, in the way, Both in the slogan and in the target. The choice of revolutionary Islam as an ideology of struggle and resistance, an attempt to achieve Islamic rule and the role of intellectual currents in various layers of Islamic societies are exemplary examples of the deep effects of the discourse of resistance (Shiite) on this domain. In the same vein, in order to maintain the political structure of the countries of the region and subsequently to prevent the maximization of the growing power of this discourse, the Salafist discourses and the Brotherhood sought to confront the maximum with resistance discourse (Shiite). The same has been the case of a self-proclaimed and sometimes secretive war between the two discourses, and, of course, caused by the Salafist discourse and the Brotherhood.