Comparative review of thological requirements of Hegel ontological argument with sadra seddiqin argument

In this paper, we compare between Ontological Argument and Seddiqin Argument and we assume that these Arguments represent two metaphysical point of view (Idealism and Originality of Being) and we assume that with regarding this representation, we can thought on these argument in more correct way. In our view, Ontological Argument  is based on Idealism, and Idealism gone a fundamental change from premodern to modern period, for this reason, Ontological argument gone a fundamental change  and this change entails to fundamental different  in  the  sense of final consequence of this argument and by this reason, it is necessary  that we regard this difference. Given that Presentation of two readings of ontological argument, we can find which reading of ontological argument Correspondence with seddiqin argument and which one diverge from it. Meanwhile, Given that different bases in Ontological Argument and Seddiqin Argument, we can obtain a more correct understand of  metaphysical background of Ontological argument.