Examining the Components of "Subject", "Obligation" and "Mokallaf" in the Field of Individual and Government Jurisprudence

Common jurisprudence is a methodological knowledge in order to infer religious terms of ruling. The nature of this method is based on dissolution and decomposition logic. On the other hand, government jurisprudence that derives from a social need, believes in the evolution of the method of discovery of a ruling, the recognition of subjects and the conformity of sentences to matters based on compilation logic. The result of these two looks is methodological differences between individual and government jurisprudence. The authors in the present study, with a quadratic and methodological study, seek to analyze and express triple Difference between individual and governmental jurisprudence.