A Fair Moral Assessment of Arbitration before Judicial Quasi-Judicial Processes in the Iranian Legal System with Emphasis on the Principles of Fair Procedure

The arbitration body, as a method of dispute settlement based on the agreement and contention of the parties to the dispute, has long been favored by the public. This popular system of arbitration has privileges that make it superior to other methods of dispute resolution. Diversification and diversification of references as well as their functioning make it difficult to formulate a single administrative code of law that is based on fair trial principles, But the quasi-judicial nature and their differentiation from judicial and rule of law principles and administrative practices can be common ground for investigating the conduct of investigations that may create a single trial and non-compliance with legal requirements. In judgment, arbitration, administrative hearings, and in general, any type of legal action based on fairness is a moral conscience that recognizes the issue. In general, the principle of fairness can be characterized as impartiality, rejection of bias, rejection of bias, listening to the other party's (fair hearing), performance of duty without regard for personal and group tendencies, with due diligence, reinforcement and trustworthiness, and ... enumerated. We therefore seek to examine the ethical assessment of fair arbitration prior to quasi-judicial hearings in the Iranian legal system with an emphasis on the principles of fair trial.