The Analysis of the Jurisprudential Obligation of Egotism and Egotism Sentence on the Basis of Analysis of the Content of Hadiths

Inference of the Jurisprudential obligation sentence of egotism and Examining the effect of this moral illness in the practice of worship have made different perspectives in jurisprudential knowledge.  Self-efficacy is due to ignorance of the greatness of God and with an imaginary perfection, it is forgotten that God attributes success. In this essay, which an analytical-descriptive method has been performed, while exploring the concept of egotism and the same concepts, it explains the challenges of the jurisprudential views about the self-efficacy sentence. The jurisprudents in the discovery of the jurisprudential sentence of egotism have provided two views of forbiddingness and it's against. Some jurists have also mentioned the egotism as the irreconcilable attributes of the religious order. In the context of the egotism situational sentence, there are also ideas such as the void of worship due to the intent of deception, void in sync with worship; and non-void. This paper, on the basis of judging between jurisprudential views, has evaluated the most important hadiths in this field discursively. In the hadith documentation, different facts are considered to be forbidden. On the other hand, the provisions of the hadiths include reduction (decrease) or non-reciprocity, with the validity of worship; which prevents the emergence of hadiths in the event of a nullity. Accordingly, the hadith documentation indicates only the aversion of this attribute; and recognizes it as the cause of spiritual excursion to God and wickedness in worship.