Convergence and Divergence of Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules in Iranian, Afghan and International Documents

In the field of international law it is the norms and requirements that are addressed in the UN Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001) (which is required by Article 25 of the United Nations Charter) and the Convention on the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (1999) Search. Other data provided by the Anti-Terrorism Financing Act (2004) in Afghanistan, as well as the Anti-Terrorism Financing Act (2015) and the Amending the Anti-Terrorism Financing Act (1397), which are not in conflict with the law and the Constitution. A law is in place to finance terrorism. The findings of this article confirm the relative convergence between Iranian and Afghan criminal law, but divergence can be summarized as follows: First. Technical deficiencies in the 1999 Convention that are not evident in the laws of Afghanistan and Iran. These include: 1) failure to provide sufficient scientific precautionary principles in the convention; 2) addressing the subject matter and failure to provide the necessary method for the discovery of the crime and prosecution and trial separately; Second, Take necessary measures to prevent terrorist acts, including providing timely warnings to other countries through the exchange of information.