Dead Functions in the Syntactic Rhetoric of the Persian Literature of Minor Asia in the Balkans Based on Theory of Halliday and considering Golzar Damsaz-e Qerimi,Roza-tol-oqul-e Malatyevee and Bolblestan of Moostari

According to Halliday, grammar consists of three main structures including: The representational, the interpersonal, and the contextual structure .These structures are the verifying factors of the representational, interpersonal and contextual highlighted of language. Since the individualized events and thoughts can be represented in the language, the role of language can be investigated in three levels .According to formalists, literariness is the departure from the natural norm of spoken language. In Halliday's view, meaning is the function in the context; therefore, meaning changes with the shift of functions. Because of its rich literature, Persian literature has been particularly popular languages like Minor Asia (Anatolia), the Balkans and India. It is taught as a literary language in their schools. Therefore, the Graduates of these schools have created many works in this language. The syntax used by these writers can be clearly evaluated by Halliday Functional Grammar. The purpose of the present study is to examine and evaluate the success of Minor Asian writers as well as their ability and inability to highlight syntactic roles and to attribute dead roles to syntactic components in three works. Qerimi and his writer doesn’t have a copy and translate it form other writers’ books.